Trusted Computing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/nncse.v1i4.518Keywords:
TRUSTED, COMPUTINGAbstract
Trusted Computing (TC) could be a technology developed and promoted by the TrustyTRUSTED Computing cluster. The term is essentially derived from the sphere of trusty systems and incorporates a special meaning. With trusty computing, the PC can systematically behave in expected ways, and people's behaviors are enforced by element and computer code. Trusty computing involves corroborating whether one PC is trustable to a different one or not. During this we tend to primarily reach to specialize in a very important feature associated with trust computing, which is trust. Within the widely used public-key cryptography, creation of keys is done on the native PC, and also the creator has complete, or say full, management over the World Health Organization, which has access thereto, and consequentially, their own security policies. In some planned encryption-decryption chips, a private/public secret is embedded for good into the hardware once it's factory-made, and hardware makers would have the chance to record the key with noproof of doing this. With this key it might be possible to possess access to information encrypted with it and to manifest because of it. It would be fairly trivial for a manufacturer to grant a duplicate of this key to the govt. or the computer code makers, because the platform should undergo steps so it works with Echo computer code. So as to trust something that's echoed by or encrypted by a TPM or a trusty PC, therefore, one needs to trust the corporation that created that chip, the corporation that designed the chip, those corporations allowed to form computer code for the chip, and also the ability and interest of these corporations to not compromise the method. The real goal is to be ready to bind information to applications, users, and particularly computers.
References
I. Alves, T. and Felton, D. (2004). TrustZone: integrated hardware and software security, White paper, ARM.
II. Anderson, R. (2003). Cryptography and competition policy: Issues with trusted computing. Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics and Information Security.
III. AR Baugh, B. (2002). Improving the TCPA specification, IEEE Computer 35(8): 77–79.
IV. Brickell, E., Camenish, J. and Chen, L. (2005). The DAA scheme in context, in Mitchell (2005), chapter 5.
V. Cooper, A. and Martin, A. (2006a). Towards a secure, tamper-proof grid platform. CCGRID, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 373–380.
VI. Cooper, A. and Martin, A. (2006b). Towards an open, trusted digital rights management platform, DRM ’06: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Digital rights management, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 79–88.
VII. DoD (1985). Department of Defense Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria, DoD Standard 5200.28-STD, DoD.
VIII. Gollman, D. (2004). Why trust is bad for security. http://www.sics.se/policy2005/Policy Pres1/dg-policy-trust.ppt
IX. Grawrock, D. (2008). Dynamics of a Trusted Platform: A building block approach, Intel Press.
X. Heasman, J. (2006). Implementing and detecting an acpi bios rootkit, presentation.https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-federal-06/BHFed-06-Heasman.pdf
XI. Huh, J. H. and Martin, A. (2008). Trusted logging for grid computing, 3rd Asia-Pacific Trusted Infrastructure Technologies Conference,China.
XII. Kauer, B. (2007). Oslo: Improving the security of trusted computing, Proceedings of the 16th USENIX Security Symposium, Boston, Mass., USA.http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/papers ps/kauer07-oslo.pdf
XIII. Kuhlmann, D., Lo Presti, S., Ramunno, G., Vernizzi, D., Bayer, E., Katrcolu, M. A. and Gngren, B. (2008). Private electronic transaction (pet) proof-of-concept prototype documentation, Deliverable10c.3, Open Trusted Computing Project.
XIV. Marchesini, J., Smith, S., Wild, O. and MacDonald, R. (2003). Experimenting with TCPA/TCG hardware, or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the bear, Technical Report TR2003-476, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
XV. Martin, A. and Yau, P.-W. (2007). Grid security: next steps, Information Security Technical Report 12(3): 113–122.
XVI. Mitchell, C. (ed.) (2005). Trusted Computing, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London.
XVII. Oppliger, R. and Rytz, R. (2005). Does trusted computing remedy computer security problems? IEEE Security and Privacy 3(2): 16–19.
XVIII. Safford, D. (2002). Clarifying misinformation on TCPA. http://www.research.ibm.com/gsal/tcpa/tcpa rebuttal.pdf.
XIX. Stallman, R. M. (2002). Can you trust your computer? in J. Gay (ed.), Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman, GNU Press, chapter 17, pp. 117–120.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
